WhatsApp’s 3.5 Billion Account Scrape: Comedic Oversight or Security Wake-Up Call?

A research team from the University of Vienna cracked a technique to enumerate 3.5 billion WhatsApp accounts, revealing a flaw in WhatsApp’s defenses. WhatsApp owner Meta quickly rolled out fixes, emphasizing that no private messages were leaked. The researchers have since securely deleted the data, proving they are better at breakups than most of us.

Pro Dashboard

Hot Take:

In the world of cyber cat-and-mouse, who knew phone numbers were the cheese? Researchers from the University of Vienna have taken enumeration to a whole new level, leaving WhatsApp scrambling faster than you can say “privacy settings”. But fear not, Meta has patched the loophole, leaving us all to wonder: who needs a phone book when you have an enumeration technique?

Key Points:

  • Researchers from the University of Vienna scraped 3.5 billion WhatsApp accounts using a novel enumeration technique.
  • Meta has since rolled out mitigations to prevent exploitation of this vulnerability.
  • The technique involved checking possible phone number combinations for registration on WhatsApp.
  • Data scraped included timestamps, public keys, and in some cases, profile pictures and ‘about’ info.
  • Meta has emphasized that no messages or non-public data were exposed, and privacy settings can limit information visibility.

Membership Required

 You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels
Already a member? Log in here
The Nimble Nerd
Confessional Booth of Our Digital Sins

Okay, deep breath, let's get this over with. In the grand act of digital self-sabotage, we've littered this site with cookies. Yep, we did that. Why? So your highness can have a 'premium' experience or whatever. These traitorous cookies hide in your browser, eagerly waiting to welcome you back like a guilty dog that's just chewed your favorite shoe. And, if that's not enough, they also tattle on which parts of our sad little corner of the web you obsess over. Feels dirty, doesn't it?