UK’s Ministry of Defence Dodges Investigation Over Costly Afghan Data Leak: Comedy of Errors or Tragic Oversight?

The UK’s data protection watchdog decided against probing a major Ministry of Defence data breach that endangered Afghan lives. Information Commissioner John Edwards cited resource challenges and the potential for hindering the MoD’s response as reasons. The breach, made public after a superinjunction was lifted, exposed sensitive Afghan resettlement data.

Pro Dashboard

Hot Take:

In a classic “Oops, we did it again” moment, the UK’s Ministry of Defence (MoD) accidentally leaked Afghan resettlement data in a spreadsheet so large, it had more lines than a Shakespearean play. And while the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) decided not to investigate, citing reasons as mysterious as a James Bond plot, the public is left wondering if Britain’s defense strategy is just a well-meaning game of “Guess Who?” with national security.

Key Points:

– The MoD leak involved 33,345 lines of Afghan resettlement data accidentally shared.
– Information Commissioner John Edwards opted not to launch an investigation.
– The ICO cited logistical challenges and hindrance to MoD’s response as reasons.
– A previous incident involving BCC blunders already resulted in a £350,000 fine.
– A joint effort to improve public sector data protection is planned by year’s end.

Membership Required

 You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels
Already a member? Log in here
The Nimble Nerd
Confessional Booth of Our Digital Sins

Okay, deep breath, let's get this over with. In the grand act of digital self-sabotage, we've littered this site with cookies. Yep, we did that. Why? So your highness can have a 'premium' experience or whatever. These traitorous cookies hide in your browser, eagerly waiting to welcome you back like a guilty dog that's just chewed your favorite shoe. And, if that's not enough, they also tattle on which parts of our sad little corner of the web you obsess over. Feels dirty, doesn't it?