The STOP CSAM Act: Why It’s a Comedy of Errors for Encryption and Free Speech
The STOP CSAM Act of 2025 aims to curb child sexual abuse material, but critics argue it threatens end-to-end encryption and free speech. By broadening legal liability for online platforms, it could undermine digital security and force providers to censor lawful content. Tell Congress not to outlaw encrypted apps.
Hot Take:
Congress is trying to “protect” us by turning the internet into a digital dystopia. The STOP CSAM Act of 2025 aims to stop child exploitation but might just stop secure communication and free speech instead. This bill is like trying to swat a fly with a sledgehammer—you might get the fly, but you’ll definitely break the table.
Key Points:
- The STOP CSAM Act of 2025 threatens to undermine end-to-end encryption services.
- The bill could punish internet companies for lawful content because of broad definitions of “promote” and “facilitate”.
- Encrypted service providers might face lawsuits even for content they can’t see due to encryption.
- The affirmative defense clause is expensive and insufficient, potentially bankrupting smaller platforms.
- The bill introduces a new exception to Section 230, threatening free speech by increasing censorship and litigation risks.
Already a member? Log in here