Okay, deep breath, let's get this over with. In the grand act of digital self-sabotage, we've littered this site with cookies. Yep, we did that. Why? So your highness can have a 'premium' experience or whatever. These traitorous cookies hide in your browser, eagerly waiting to welcome you back like a guilty dog that's just chewed your favorite shoe. And, if that's not enough, they also tattle on which parts of our sad little corner of the web you obsess over. Feels dirty, doesn't it?
The C Language’s Chainsaw Juggling Act: Why It’s Time for a Safer Code Circus
Buffer overflows are the IT world’s version of juggling chainsaws without safety guards. The FBI and CISA are tired of big tech’s reckless coding, urging a shift from C to safer languages. It’s time to abandon the circus act and embrace tools that won’t lead to catastrophe—or chaos.
Hot Take:
Ah, the glorious world of coding! Where buffer overflows are the banana peels on the slapstick comedy floor of IT. The FBI and CISA have finally donned their superhero capes, swooping in to save us from the chaotic chainsaw of C. But let’s face it, asking developers to switch from C is like asking a circus performer to swap their flaming hoops for a hula hoop. It’s all fun and games until someone loses a byte—or a billion dollars. Buckle up, folks, because this is one rollercoaster you don’t want to code without a seatbelt!
Key Points:
- FBI and CISA are frustrated by the persistent issue of buffer overflows in coding.
- They suggest moving away from C to more modern, safer coding languages.
- Buffer overflows are avoidable, yet continue to plague enterprise IT systems.
- The resistance to change is partly cultural and technological inertia.
- Transitioning to safer code practices could become a legal necessity.
Already a member? Log in here