Thai Court’s Spyware Ruling Sparks Outrage: Activist’s Case Dismissed Amid Pegasus Controversy
A Thai court dismisses pro-democracy activist Jatupat Boonpattararaksa’s lawsuit over alleged phone hacking with Pegasus spyware by NSO Group. Despite claims of spyware infection during protests, the court found insufficient proof. Jatupat remains committed to fighting for rights, while critics find the ruling disappointing and concerning for future privacy battles.
Hot Take:
In a plot twist worthy of a cyber-thriller, Thailand’s court has decided that spyware allegations need more than just a good conspiracy theory to stick. Jatupat Boonpattararaksa’s lawsuit against the Israeli tech firm ends up as a lesson in courtroom drama, where the real winners are state security and, perhaps, a few bemused tech enthusiasts.
Key Points:
- Jatupat Boonpattararaksa’s lawsuit was dismissed due to insufficient evidence of Pegasus spyware on his phone.
- The lawsuit accused NSO Group of violating constitutional rights by enabling spyware targeting activists.
- An investigation found 35 individuals in Thailand were targeted by Pegasus in 2020 and 2021.
- The Thai government admitted using Pegasus for “security or narcotics” purposes.
- Amnesty International and others consider the court ruling “deeply alarming.”
Already a member? Log in here