Rockwell Automation’s Stack Overflow Blunder: A Comedy of Errors in Critical Infrastructure Security

Attention: The Industrial Data Center (IDC) with Cisco Switching has a stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability that could let an attacker play puppet master with your system. View CSAF and brace for impact! Rockwell Automation urges users to take swift action to avoid turning critical infrastructure into a hacker’s playground.

Pro Dashboard

Hot Take:

Look out, folks! It seems like our friendly neighborhood hackers are trying to crash the party at Rockwell Automation using Cisco switches. All it takes is a little SNMP magic, and voilà, they’ve got the keys to the kingdom! Time to update your cybersecurity strategy before your network becomes their playground.

Key Points:

  • Rockwell Automation products, especially those with Cisco switching, are at risk from a stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability.
  • This vulnerability can lead to arbitrary code execution, potentially giving attackers full control of systems.
  • Affected products include Industrial Data Centers and various managed support contracts with Cisco components.
  • The vulnerability is linked to Cisco IOS XE Software’s SNMP subsystem, where crafty attackers could exploit it remotely.
  • Mitigation involves contacting Rockwell Automation for managed services or applying Cisco’s workarounds for other users.

Membership Required

 You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels
Already a member? Log in here
The Nimble Nerd
Confessional Booth of Our Digital Sins

Okay, deep breath, let's get this over with. In the grand act of digital self-sabotage, we've littered this site with cookies. Yep, we did that. Why? So your highness can have a 'premium' experience or whatever. These traitorous cookies hide in your browser, eagerly waiting to welcome you back like a guilty dog that's just chewed your favorite shoe. And, if that's not enough, they also tattle on which parts of our sad little corner of the web you obsess over. Feels dirty, doesn't it?