Ransomware Racket: Why Businesses Need to Fund Recovery, Not Criminals

In 2024, organizations shelled out $813 million to cybercriminals due to ransomware. Rhode Island’s cyberattack serves as a reminder: paying ransoms only fuels more attacks. To break this cycle, businesses must stop budgeting for ransom payments and invest in recovery strategies. Fund recovery, not ransom demands. The future of cybersecurity depends on it.

Pro Dashboard

Hot Take:

Oh, to be a cybercriminal in 2024! With businesses forking over a whopping $813 million to hit menaces, it’s like winning the lottery every day—minus the scratch-off tickets, but with way more drama and digital heists. Rhode Island’s $5 million payout might have given its officials a whiff of victory, but it left a stench of distrust in the air. Time to stop treating ransomware like a budgeted office coffee expense and start treating it like the preventable crisis it is. After all, why pay villains when you can pay for peace of mind?

Key Points:

  • Businesses coughed up $813 million due to ransomware in 2024.
  • Rhode Island paid a $5 million ransom, sparking a month-long operational disruption.
  • Paying ransoms perpetuates the cycle of cybercrime, fueling more attacks.
  • Organizations are urged to invest in recovery plans over ransom payments.
  • The FBI advises against paying ransoms due to no data recovery guarantees.

Membership Required

 You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels
Already a member? Log in here
The Nimble Nerd
Confessional Booth of Our Digital Sins

Okay, deep breath, let's get this over with. In the grand act of digital self-sabotage, we've littered this site with cookies. Yep, we did that. Why? So your highness can have a 'premium' experience or whatever. These traitorous cookies hide in your browser, eagerly waiting to welcome you back like a guilty dog that's just chewed your favorite shoe. And, if that's not enough, they also tattle on which parts of our sad little corner of the web you obsess over. Feels dirty, doesn't it?