Quantum Cryptography: The Emperor’s New Codes or Future Savior?
Quantum computers remain more of a magic show than a real threat, argues Professor Peter Gutmann. He claims modern cryptography is as safe from quantum attacks as a locked door is from a dog with an abacus. While NIST preps for post-quantum cryptography, Gutmann insists we’re centuries away from needing it.
Hot Take:
Quantum computers are like Bigfoot: everyone keeps talking about them, but no one’s really seen them do anything impressive yet. NIST’s efforts for post-quantum cryptography feel like preparing for a zombie apocalypse with a Nerf gun. Meanwhile, Peter Gutmann is out here calling out the charade, making us wonder if we’re all just victims of a high-tech magic show.
Key Points:
- NIST has been pushing for post-quantum cryptographic algorithms, fearing future quantum capability.
- Peter Gutmann argues current quantum computers can’t factor numbers larger than 21 without “cheating.”
- Quantum-resistant algorithms are positioned to replace current standards like RSA.
- Gutmann humorously suggests quantum breakthroughs could be replicated with an abacus and a dog.
- Despite quantum hype, experts like Gutmann remain skeptical of any immediate cryptographic threat.
Already a member? Log in here