Meta’s “Torrential” Trouble: How Kadrey v. Meta Could Rewrite AI’s Copyright Playbook
The EFF has filed an amicus brief in Kadrey v. Meta, addressing the copyright storm around AI training. The case sidesteps fair use, focusing on how Meta allegedly used BitTorrent to acquire training materials. The outcome could impact whether AI evolves democratically or under an oligopoly’s grip. Who knew BitTorrent could spark such drama?
Hot Take:
Oh, the drama! In the latest episode of “As the AI World Turns,” the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) has entered the courtroom with an amicus brief in the case of Kadrey v. Meta, starring Sarah Silverman and friends. The plot twist? It’s not about what Meta did with the books, but how they snagged them—cue the BitTorrent baddies! As the legal drama unfolds, we’re all left wondering if this courtroom thriller will end with AI developers dancing to the fair use tune or crying over broken algorithms.
Key Points:
- EFF filed an amicus brief in the Kadrey v. Meta case, focusing on Meta’s alleged use of BitTorrent to obtain training materials.
- The case sidesteps the usual fair use argument, challenging how Meta acquired content rather than its use.
- EFF argues that the decision could impact the future of AI technology and the fair use doctrine.
- The case involves high-profile plaintiffs, including Sarah Silverman, concerned about “pirated” copies of their works.
- EFF warns against creating a copyright law carve-out for materials obtained via certain technologies like BitTorrent.