Little Rock Shoots Down ShotSpotter: A Victory for Privacy and Community Rights

Little Rock has ditched ShotSpotter, joining a nationwide trend of cities rejecting the error-prone gunshot detection tech. Critics say it risks privacy and fuels discriminatory policing. As the city saves $188,000, it’s a win for those challenging surveillance technologies and their dubious impact on public safety. Can your city follow suit?

Pro Dashboard

Hot Take:

Looks like Little Rock just gave ShotSpotter the boot, proving once again that sometimes the loudest sound a city can make is the quiet click of a contract not being renewed. Kudos to the community members who shot their shot at City Hall and hit the bullseye! Now, let’s hope they use that $188,000 to buy something that actually works—like a few good pairs of noise-canceling headphones for city council meetings.

Key Points:

  • Little Rock City Hall packed with community members against ShotSpotter.
  • Board members voted 5-3 to end the city’s contract with ShotSpotter.
  • ShotSpotter accused of steering federal grants to secure funding.
  • EFF criticizes gunshot detection systems for enabling discriminatory policing.
  • National Stop ShotSpotter Coalition supports grassroots advocacy against the tech.

Membership Required

 You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels
Already a member? Log in here
The Nimble Nerd
Confessional Booth of Our Digital Sins

Okay, deep breath, let's get this over with. In the grand act of digital self-sabotage, we've littered this site with cookies. Yep, we did that. Why? So your highness can have a 'premium' experience or whatever. These traitorous cookies hide in your browser, eagerly waiting to welcome you back like a guilty dog that's just chewed your favorite shoe. And, if that's not enough, they also tattle on which parts of our sad little corner of the web you obsess over. Feels dirty, doesn't it?