Ivanti’s Cloud Catastrophe: Patch Now or Face the Wrath of Wandering Exploits!

Ivanti Endpoint Manager Mobile (EPMM) faces a double whammy: two bugs now exploit cloud instances, not just on-premises setups. One’s an authentication bypass, the other’s remote-code execution. The result? Rogue malware hijinks galore. Patch now, before your devices become the unwitting stars in a hacker’s twisted comedy show.

Pro Dashboard

Hot Take:

Ivanti’s unfortunate bug duo is like the cyber version of a bad buddy cop movie: one exploits on-premises environments, the other takes the cloud by storm, and together they cause chaos in the digital streets. Forget popcorn; you better grab some patches and secure your systems before the credits roll on your data.

Key Points:

– Two vulnerabilities, CVE-2025-4427 and CVE-2025-4428, in Ivanti Endpoint Manager Mobile (EPMM) are being actively exploited.
– These bugs allow hackers to run malware and hijack systems, affecting both on-premises and cloud environments.
– Proof-of-concept exploits are circulating, with the notorious Sliver remote-control tool being deployed in attacks.
– The US Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) has added these vulnerabilities to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog.
– The flaws are linked to insecure processing in open-source libraries, particularly involving Java Expression Language and Spring.

Membership Required

 You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels
Already a member? Log in here
The Nimble Nerd
Confessional Booth of Our Digital Sins

Okay, deep breath, let's get this over with. In the grand act of digital self-sabotage, we've littered this site with cookies. Yep, we did that. Why? So your highness can have a 'premium' experience or whatever. These traitorous cookies hide in your browser, eagerly waiting to welcome you back like a guilty dog that's just chewed your favorite shoe. And, if that's not enough, they also tattle on which parts of our sad little corner of the web you obsess over. Feels dirty, doesn't it?