Is Privacy Really Dead? The Comedy of Errors in Kristi Noem’s Surveillance Saga
Privacy isn’t dead. Just ask Kristi Noem, who insists “doxing” masked federal agents is “violence.” Legal experts call her bluff. As Trump-era ICE raids escalate, Americans are flipping the script, documenting law enforcement at unprecedented levels. It’s not just surveillance; it’s a showdown of transparency versus secrecy.
Hot Take:
In the battle of public privacy versus government transparency, Kristi Noem is trying to convince us that the real crime isn’t what the government is doing, but rather that people are holding up their phones and saying, “Smile, you’re on candid camera!”
Key Points:
- The Department of Homeland Security is labeling the identification of federal agents as “doxing” and “violence.”
- Surveillance is now a two-way street with citizens documenting law enforcement activities.
- Public capturing of police activities has evolved from a protest tactic to a widespread citizen practice.
- The Trump administration has taken legal and punitive actions against those documenting law enforcement.
- Experts argue that public accountability shouldn’t be mistaken for surveillance.
Already a member? Log in here