Okay, deep breath, let's get this over with. In the grand act of digital self-sabotage, we've littered this site with cookies. Yep, we did that. Why? So your highness can have a 'premium' experience or whatever. These traitorous cookies hide in your browser, eagerly waiting to welcome you back like a guilty dog that's just chewed your favorite shoe. And, if that's not enough, they also tattle on which parts of our sad little corner of the web you obsess over. Feels dirty, doesn't it?
Hacker Havoc: Desperation or Deception? Unraveling the Mystery of Cybercrime Re-Victimization
Threat actors in cyber extortion are like desperate exes—recycling their old targets hoping for a payout. Are they boldly dirty or just plain desperate? Our latest data hints at a cyber soap opera worth streaming. Stay tuned.
Hot Take:
Re-victimization: the unwelcome sequel in the cybercrime saga. It appears threat actors have taken to recycling, but instead of plastics, they're reusing victims like a toddler insists on watching the same cartoon for the 100th time. Sometimes it's a crossover episode with an affiliate playing musical chairs with data, or maybe it's just a desperate attempt to squeeze more bitcoins out of a previously tapped victim. Either way, it's about as ethical as a pickpocket returning to the scene of the crime for the victim's matching shoes—after already swiping their wallet.Already a member? Log in here