GitHub Supply Chain Chaos: When One Attack Just Isn’t Enough!

GitHub supply chain attack spills secrets from 23,000 projects. Researchers suspect a compromise of reviewdog/action-setup on March 11 led to the theft of a personal access token used in tj-actions/changed-files. The attack was executed with surgical precision, suggesting a high-value target. Check secrets and rotate if exposed.

Pro Dashboard

Hot Take:

GitHub’s supply chain attack saga is the gift that keeps on giving, like a really bad sequel no one asked for. This time, it’s a case of “who compromised who first” in the battle of the GitHub Actions. Looks like the cybercriminals are playing a game of dominoes, and unfortunately, tj-actions and reviewdog were the first to fall. Who knew GitHub actions could be so… action-packed?

Key Points:

  • Wiz researchers suspect reviewdog/action-setup was the initial point of compromise in the GitHub supply chain attack.
  • The attack on reviewdog may have led to the compromise of tj-actions/changed-files, affecting over 23,000 projects.
  • Malicious code injected into reviewdog/action-setup leaked CI/CD secrets, including the PAT for tj-actions.
  • The attacker stealthily reverted changes in reviewdog to cover their tracks.
  • Security experts advise users to rotate exposed secrets and consider alternative actions.

Membership Required

 You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels
Already a member? Log in here
The Nimble Nerd
Confessional Booth of Our Digital Sins

Okay, deep breath, let's get this over with. In the grand act of digital self-sabotage, we've littered this site with cookies. Yep, we did that. Why? So your highness can have a 'premium' experience or whatever. These traitorous cookies hide in your browser, eagerly waiting to welcome you back like a guilty dog that's just chewed your favorite shoe. And, if that's not enough, they also tattle on which parts of our sad little corner of the web you obsess over. Feels dirty, doesn't it?