Fair Use Under Fire: Tattoo Case Could Redraw Creative Boundaries
In Sedlik v. Von Drachenberg, a tattoo artist’s creative take on a Miles Davis photo is at the heart of a legal battle that could reshape fair use rights. Sedlik’s appeal argues for tighter restrictions, potentially limiting artistic freedom. The case underscores the need for balanced copyright laws to protect innovation and expression.
Hot Take:
In a world where copyright is as fierce as a tattoo needle, the battle for fair use rights is no mere skin-deep skirmish. Brace yourselves, for the ink-and-paper showdown of Sedlik v. Von Drachenberg could redefine how we remix, rehash, and repurpose in the creative cosmos. And remember, if the 9th Circuit isn’t careful, we might just end up with a tattoo of regret on the face of innovation.
Key Points:
- EFF weighs in on Sedlik v. Von Drachenberg, a case potentially reshaping fair use rights.
- Jury found no copyright infringement, as the tattoo differed from the original photo.
- Sedlik’s appeal could narrow fair use by focusing on “targeted” uses.
- The principle of “reasonably necessary” use upholds new artistic expressions.
- Expansive views on commerciality of social media posts risk constraining artists.
Already a member? Log in here