Apache’s Tika Toolkit Gets a 10.0 Flaw: How Vulnerable Are You?

Tika’s recent vulnerability saga is like a soap opera for techies. Apache fixed an 8.4 flaw only to drop a 10.0-rated bombshell with CVE-2025-66516. Users who upgraded tika-parser-pdf-module but ignored tika-core updates are still vulnerable. It’s a plot twist worthy of daytime television, starring XML External Entity injections!

Pro Dashboard

Hot Take:

Apache Tika’s vulnerability is like that one friend who insists they’re fine, but keeps spilling their drink on your couch. Meanwhile, the Cybersecurity world resembles a game of whack-a-mole, with each issue popping up as soon as the last one’s resolved. Whether it’s digital predators or crypto scams, the cyber realm is where the wild west meets Shakespeare’s comedy of errors. Saddle up, folks, we’re in for a wild ride!

Key Points:

  • A significant flaw has been discovered in Apache Tika, rated a perfect 10.0 in the vulnerability scale.
  • OVH is bolstering its defenses against a new wave of massive DDoS attacks from South America and the US.
  • The Cyber Deterrence and Response Act is back, aiming to give the US a strong cyber defense framework.
  • NIST releases new guidelines to secure IoT devices, which are often security nightmares.
  • Intellexa continues its spyware operations despite sanctions, while the DoJ is busy busting crypto scam sites.

Membership Required

 You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels
Already a member? Log in here
The Nimble Nerd
Confessional Booth of Our Digital Sins

Okay, deep breath, let's get this over with. In the grand act of digital self-sabotage, we've littered this site with cookies. Yep, we did that. Why? So your highness can have a 'premium' experience or whatever. These traitorous cookies hide in your browser, eagerly waiting to welcome you back like a guilty dog that's just chewed your favorite shoe. And, if that's not enough, they also tattle on which parts of our sad little corner of the web you obsess over. Feels dirty, doesn't it?